Most disruptors either sell 3D printers or operate as on-demand manufacturers, with some even engaging in both segments. Most companies in these two segments are still in the m inimum viable product or g o-to-market stages, although several have transitioned into the e xpansion stage. Comparatively fewer startups operate in the AM materials, AM software, and post-printing solutions segments, with most being g o-to-market -stage players. In part, the relative popularity of segments like 3D printers may stem from the all-inclusive and end-to-end nature of these solutions. 3D printer companies typically offer their own AM materials and software, reducing the demand for third-party, standalone materials and software providers. To remain relevant, AM materials, software, and post-printing companies have worked to create solutions compatible with other AM players. For example, post-printing solutions provider Postprocess Technologies’ software and hardware are compatible with the products of major AM players like 3D Systems, Nexa3D, hp, Carbon, and Desktop Metal.

By mid-2022, early entrants like Desktop Metal, Carbon, Markforged, 3D Systems, Formlabs, and Velo3D had collectively raised over USD 2.5 billion. Among these, Desktop Metal achieved unicorn status with a Series E round in 2019 before listing on the NYSE in 2020. Privately held companies Carbon and Formlabs also achieved unicorn status through Series E funding rounds in 2019 and 2021, respectively.

Most of the disruptors enter the market with proprietary technology featuring variations on core underlying tech to enable differentiation. Since AM technologies are yet to achieve peak utilization relative to traditional manufacturing methods like CNC machining, there remains intense market competition, as AM companies constantly look to enhance print speed and enable high-volume printing.